Re: [soa-rm] Taking the time to go faster

[Matthew MacKenzie <mattm@adobe.com>]

And I have one more suggestion:  resist the +1 urge, and respond only if 
you are in dissent, or have some important variation of the message you 
are agreeing with in principle.

-matt

Peter F Brown wrote:

>All:
>Trying to follow the flood of posts, with the time differences, low
>bandwidths, travel, etc. is somewhat daunting, as is any attempt to butt in
>on an exchange that seems well under way if not done-and-dusted, by the time
>I get around to seeing it. On some days, my bandwidth on the road is just
>wide and long enough to download the latest 50+ postings and don't have the
>time to read up, let alone reply. I might be just a co-scribe, but I have
>feelings too ;-)
>
>Could I make a suggestion: don't reply to a posting upon which you have
>already commented within a min 24 hour period. This way, we avoid endless
>(however interesting) dialogues, open the timeframe while dear ol' Mother
>Earth turns and sheds light on others, and gives us all pause for occasional
>but much needed reflection.
>
>Less is more...da di da...But seriously, sometimes you need to take the time
>to get to results fast.
>
>-Peter
>(from a 28k connection in Copenhagen airport)
>
>A little knowledge is a dangerous thing
>A little wisdom is always priceless
>
>
>  
>