[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [soa-rm] David Linthicum Says: "ESB versus Fabric.Stop It!"
In examples I've seen, the intent is to be both closed (but very large) and SOA. Ken At 11:48 AM 5/27/2005, Peter F Brown wrote: >Surely there is nothing incompatible with a system being closed (!=SOA) and >consisting of a range of accessible services, each of which could be SOA. >Whether something is SOA is surely a question of context and intent > >-Peter > >-----Original Message----- >From: Ken Laskey [mailto:klaskey@mitre.org] >Sent: 26 May 2005 12:43 >To: SOA-RM >Subject: Re: [soa-rm] David Linthicum Says: "ESB versus Fabric.Stop It!" > >This isn't necessarily true because I can have a closed system that has a >large, varied number of accessible services but no services are allowed from >the outside world. Many governance strategies assume this situation. We >get back again that if we have one service and one consumer and that service >is currently sufficient for the needs of the consumer, do we have a SOA? > >Ken > > >On May 25, 2005, at 8:48 PM, Rex Brooks wrote: > > > Any self-contained system, is by definition, not SOA. It may have any > > number of functional services within it, but as long as it is > > self-contained it is not SOA. That's why I keep saying that the atomic > > unit of SOA is a service AND a service consumer. I guess we have to > > qualify it to the extent that the systems are essentially separate, > > even if they may have endpoint interfaces that allow connection and > > other connections are possible or even occur, but they are not > > connected as an atomic unit until the service is invoked, or an > > agreement to allow invocation has been reached. > > > > That is of course, just my opinion, even though I state it as if it > > were fact. > > > > Ciao, > > Rex > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >------------------ >Ken Laskey >MITRE Corporation, M/S H305 phone: 703-983-7934 >7515 Colshire Drive fax: 703-983-1379 >McLean VA 22102-7508 -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- / Ken Laskey \ | MITRE Corporation, M/S H305 phone: 703-983-7934 | | 7515 Colshire Drive fax: 703-983-1379 | \ McLean VA 22102-7508 / ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]