[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [soa-rm] What is NOT an SOA?
Agree that multiple inheritance is appropriate in this case. Martin -----Original Message----- From: John Harby [mailto:jharby@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 9:39 AM To: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [soa-rm] What is NOT an SOA? <quote> The three architectural approaches listed are possible bases from which to evolve an SOA RM. We need to pick one (or one of something else) as the primary base. </quote> I would think we would choose aspects of each plus possibly some additional features. For example, all of these employ distributed objects which is a practice that has been marked as an antipattern.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]