Re: [soa-rm] My stab at an SOA-RM concept map

[Matthew MacKenzie <mattm@adobe.com>]

I'm torn.

I recognize that there may be cases where services will invoke  
services, but am unsure that we need to depict that fact explicitly.

-Matt

On 31-May-05, at 1:18 PM, Chiusano Joseph wrote:

> Sorry Matt - I'll clarify without referencing the concept map
> specifically:
>
> Should we depict the notion of services consuming/invoking other
> services in our concept map?
>
> Joe
>
> Joseph Chiusano
> Booz Allen Hamilton
> Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Matthew MacKenzie [mailto:mattm@adobe.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 1:15 PM
>> To: Chiusano Joseph
>> Cc: SOA-RM
>> Subject: Re: [soa-rm] My stab at an SOA-RM concept map
>>
>> Joe,
>>
>> I don't follow your inference (!?).  Maybe you are reading
>> into the map more than you should because all of the arrows
>> on the lines are not showing up for some reason.
>>
>> -Matt
>> On 31-May-05, at 1:02 PM, Chiusano Joseph wrote:
>>
>>
>>> How about a relationship between Services and Service Descriptions
>>> called "may reference"? This would depict (through the extended
>>> relationships) services invoking other services.
>>>
>>> Joe
>>>
>>> Joseph Chiusano
>>> Booz Allen Hamilton
>>> Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Matthew MacKenzie [mailto:mattm@adobe.com]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 12:13 PM
>>>> To: Francis McCabe
>>>> Cc: SOA-RM
>>>> Subject: Re: [soa-rm] My stab at an SOA-RM concept map
>>>>
>>>> Having some problems with arrows in this tool, but I added another
>>>> relationship to contract (attached).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>