[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] My stab at an SOA-RM concept map
Ok, I'm happy with constrain as well. -matt Behera, Prasanta wrote: >That would be the term of choice for me too. >(Sorry. Didn't get a chance respond early) > >Thanks, >/Prasanta > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Peter F Brown [mailto:peter@justbrown.net] >Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 6:56 PM >To: 'SOA-RM' >Subject: RE: [soa-rm] My stab at an SOA-RM concept map > >Surely semantics "constrain" rather than "govern" or "define"? >Specifically, >they constrain meaning within a specified domain ontology > >-Peter > >-----Original Message----- >From: Behera, Prasanta [mailto:pbehera@visa.com] >Sent: 31 May 2005 20:03 >To: Matthew MacKenzie; Francis McCabe >Cc: SOA-RM >Subject: RE: [soa-rm] My stab at an SOA-RM concept map > >#1: Can u expand a little bit on the semantics of "govern"? Semantics >"define" and "govern" policy. > >#2: The relationship between "Data Model" and "Services" -- should it be >more of a association type (line instead of a arrow) > >Thanks, >/Prasanta > >-----Original Message----- >From: Matthew MacKenzie [mailto:mattm@adobe.com] >Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 9:13 AM >To: Francis McCabe >Cc: SOA-RM >Subject: Re: [soa-rm] My stab at an SOA-RM concept map > >Having some problems with arrows in this tool, but I added another >relationship to contract (attached). > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]