[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] My stab at an SOA-RM concept map
Actually, I am not happy with the constrain word here. The data-model, for example, is not constrained by the semantics of the service -- it *is* part of the semantics. Frank On Jun 1, 2005, at 8:50 AM, Matthew MacKenzie wrote: > Ok, I'm happy with constrain as well. > > -matt > Behera, Prasanta wrote: > > >> That would be the term of choice for me too. >> (Sorry. Didn't get a chance respond early) >> >> Thanks, >> /Prasanta >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Peter F Brown [mailto:peter@justbrown.net] Sent: Tuesday, >> May 31, 2005 6:56 PM >> To: 'SOA-RM' >> Subject: RE: [soa-rm] My stab at an SOA-RM concept map >> >> Surely semantics "constrain" rather than "govern" or "define"? >> Specifically, >> they constrain meaning within a specified domain ontology >> >> -Peter >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Behera, Prasanta [mailto:pbehera@visa.com] Sent: 31 May 2005 >> 20:03 >> To: Matthew MacKenzie; Francis McCabe >> Cc: SOA-RM >> Subject: RE: [soa-rm] My stab at an SOA-RM concept map >> >> #1: Can u expand a little bit on the semantics of "govern"? Semantics >> "define" and "govern" policy. >> >> #2: The relationship between "Data Model" and "Services" -- should >> it be >> more of a association type (line instead of a arrow) >> >> Thanks, >> /Prasanta >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Matthew MacKenzie [mailto:mattm@adobe.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 9:13 AM >> To: Francis McCabe >> Cc: SOA-RM >> Subject: Re: [soa-rm] My stab at an SOA-RM concept map >> >> Having some problems with arrows in this tool, but I added another >> relationship to contract (attached). >> >> >> >> >> > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]