Re: [soa-rm] My stab at an SOA-RM concept map

[Francis McCabe <fgm@fla.fujitsu.com>]

Not sure about the direction of some of these arrows.

Assuming that

A ---part of--> B

means A is a part of B, then I think

Data Model ---part of--> Semantics

reflect my pov.

Continuing, this....

Policy ---part of--> semantics

Semantics ---defined-by--> Ax. x ---part of--->Semantics

Actually, I am not that part-of is the correct predicate. View-of  
seems closer to the truth.

For example, what is the data model? The question is non-trivial  
because there is a close synergy between the data model and the  
process model. And a part-of relationship suggests separable components.

Frank




On Jun 1, 2005, at 9:09 AM, Behera, Prasanta wrote:

> How about this?
>
> Semantic ---part of ---> Data Model
> Semantic ---constrain --> Policy
> Semantic ---define------> Policy
> Semantic ---constrain---> Service (not too sure for this one).
>
> Does this work?
>
> Thanks,
> /Prasanta
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Francis McCabe [mailto:fgm@fla.fujitsu.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 8:55 AM
> To: Matthew MacKenzie
> Cc: Behera, Prasanta; peter@justbrown.net; SOA-RM
> Subject: Re: [soa-rm] My stab at an SOA-RM concept map
>
> Actually, I am not happy with the constrain word here.
>
> The data-model, for example, is not constrained by the semantics of
> the service -- it *is* part of the semantics.
>
> Frank
>
> On Jun 1, 2005, at 8:50 AM, Matthew MacKenzie wrote:
>
>
>> Ok, I'm happy with constrain as well.
>>
>> -matt
>> Behera, Prasanta wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> That would be the term of choice for me too.
>>> (Sorry. Didn't get a chance respond early)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> /Prasanta
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Peter F Brown [mailto:peter@justbrown.net] Sent: Tuesday,
>>> May 31, 2005 6:56 PM
>>> To: 'SOA-RM'
>>> Subject: RE: [soa-rm] My stab at an SOA-RM concept map
>>>
>>> Surely semantics "constrain" rather than "govern" or "define"?
>>> Specifically,
>>> they constrain meaning within a specified domain ontology
>>>
>>> -Peter
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Behera, Prasanta [mailto:pbehera@visa.com] Sent: 31 May 2005
>>> 20:03
>>> To: Matthew MacKenzie; Francis McCabe
>>> Cc: SOA-RM
>>> Subject: RE: [soa-rm] My stab at an SOA-RM concept map
>>>
>>> #1: Can u expand a little bit on the semantics of "govern"?  
>>> Semantics
>>> "define" and "govern" policy.
>>>
>>> #2: The relationship between "Data Model" and "Services" -- should
>>> it be
>>> more of a association type (line instead of a arrow)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> /Prasanta
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Matthew MacKenzie [mailto:mattm@adobe.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 9:13 AM
>>> To: Francis McCabe
>>> Cc: SOA-RM
>>> Subject: Re: [soa-rm] My stab at an SOA-RM concept map
>>>
>>> Having some problems with arrows in this tool, but I added another
>>> relationship to contract (attached).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>