[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Service Consumer in RM or not?
Since SOA was itself a buzz word invented by an analyst, perhaps we can also coin a new buzzword :) Frank On Jun 7, 2005, at 12:52 PM, Duane Nickull wrote: > > > Chiusano Joseph wrote: > > >> - A Service Orientation Reference Model (SO RM) - that is, don't >> label this as "SOA RM" but rather "SO RM" >> - A SOA Reference Architecture (SOA RA) >> rather than a single SOA Reference Model (SOA RM). >> >> > Joseph: > > Our intent (as expressed in our charter) has always been to do > this. The only difference is the change of the name from SOA RM to > SO RM. > > Pro of renaming to SO RM: > > - more accurate reflection of what it really is. > > Con of renaming to SO RM: > > - losing the correlation with SOA. We are trying to define SOA. > If we change the name, it may be perceived as defining something > different which means we are in the same place as we started when > we finish. > - People may not reconcile the work with SOA which is the primary > goal of the TC > > If there is a desire to explore this further, I would ask that > someone who is a voting member please ask that this be put up for a > web ballot. > > Duane >