OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

soa-rm message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [soa-rm] Service Consumer in RM or not?


If we do that we probably would want to accompany our use with an
explanation, as was done with SOAP. Otherwise, folks will automatically
assume that the acryonym SOA means Service Oriented Architecture.

Joe

Joseph Chiusano
Booz Allen Hamilton
Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Stiefel [mailto:development@reliablesoftware.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 12:16 PM
> To: John Harby; soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Service Consumer in RM or not?
> 
> That is why perhaps using SOA instead of Service Oriented 
> Architecture might be a partial solution.
> 
> Michael
> 
> At 11:44 AM 6/8/2005, John Harby wrote:
> >The difficult aspect is that everyone and their brother is 
> now used to 
> >the SOA buzzword. If we start inventing more do we run the risk of 
> >confusing the audiences and losing adoption?
> >
> >On 6/8/05, Francis McCabe <fgm@fla.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > > Since SOA was itself a buzz word invented by an analyst, 
> perhaps we 
> > > can also coin a new buzzword :) Frank
> > >
> > > On Jun 7, 2005, at 12:52 PM, Duane Nickull wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> - A Service Orientation Reference Model (SO RM) - that 
> is, don't 
> > > >> label this as "SOA RM" but rather "SO RM"
> > > >> - A SOA Reference Architecture (SOA RA)  rather than a 
> single SOA 
> > > >> Reference Model (SOA RM).
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > > Joseph:
> > > >
> > > > Our intent (as expressed in our charter) has always been to do 
> > > > this.  The only difference is the change of the name 
> from SOA RM 
> > > > to SO RM.
> > > >
> > > > Pro of renaming to SO RM:
> > > >
> > > > - more accurate reflection of what it really is.
> > > >
> > > > Con of renaming to SO RM:
> > > >
> > > > - losing the correlation with SOA.  We are trying to define SOA.
> > > > If we change the name, it may be perceived as defining 
> something 
> > > > different which means we are in the same place as we 
> started when 
> > > > we finish.
> > > > - People may not reconcile the work with SOA which is 
> the primary 
> > > > goal of the TC
> > > >
> > > > If there is a desire to explore this further, I would ask that 
> > > > someone who is a voting member please ask that this be 
> put up for 
> > > > a web ballot.
> > > >
> > > > Duane
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> 
> 
> 


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]