[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [soa-rm] TC Process
Duane: Picking up on your hint/proposal at the end of your mail below, I would formally move that the TC votes on the "service customer" issue. My motion is: Given the debate in the TC regarding the correct scoping of the proposed Reference Model, I move that the TC agree that the concept of 'service customer' shall not be considered an a normative concept within scope of the RM. Further discussion of this concept shall be pursued only on this basis and may be used indicatively in any illustrative appendix to the RM or in subsequent work on reference arhcitectures but shall not be included as a normative part of the reference model. Rationale: I fear we are running ahead of ourselves and sometimes running in circles. I see the importance and relevance of concepts such as consumer, message, etc. to building actual SOA architectures, but - after following the exchanges on the list in the last weeks on this and related issues - I now feel that this concept is distracting or attention and risks taking further bandwidth. Comments: - I think that if the TC can focus its attention on this motion for a couple of days, we can nail down a key issue that will also help us all clarify the scope of the RM. - I would also suggest (this is not a motion!) that at the next TC confcall, an item for discussion could be whether it would be useful to establish an RA sub-cttee already/soon that could serve to channel some of these discussions without shutting them down. Peter -----Original Message----- From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com] Sent: 07 June 2005 20:06 To: SOA-RM Subject: [soa-rm] TC Process <snip/> Moving forward, I would like to suggest that if the subject of Service Consumer is at debate, we deal with it in the following diplomatic manner. I also hope it will shed some light as per Rebekah's comment on trying to understand the differences of opinion too. That is very useful IMO. 1. A motion from a voting member to vote on the topic 2. Full discussion (can happen on the list and/or conf call). 3. When either the discussion has ended or 2/3 of the TC votes that it has gone on long enough, we have a vote. 4. After the vote, it is res judicata Currently, we do not have a motion asking for a vote. If someone wants the SC to be in the RM rather than or alongside the RA, they need to make that motion. Discussion to follow. Duane
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]