OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

soa-rm message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [soa-rm] Fwd: Re: Meeting Minutes for June 15


Prasanta
I thought what was going to happen was that Peter was going to send an email to the list and that email would be uncover views on the issue, and ultimately to prepare a motion to be voted on.
Sally

"Behera, Prasanta" <pbehera@visa.com> wrote:

Since I was the “note-taker” – How do we move this forward?

Should I update the “meeting minutes” to reflect that the whole group should be asked instead of specific individuals?

I think that was the intent but specific names were mentioned as a starting point.

 

Thanks,

/Prasanta

 

 

 


From: Sally St. Amand [mailto:sallystamand@yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 6:36 AM
To: SOA-RM
Subject: [soa-rm] Fwd: Re: Meeting Minutes for June 15

 

TC -

Duane asked that I post an email I sent to him on the list. It is below.

Sally

Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> wrote:

Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:34:00 -0700
From: Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com>
Subject: Re: Meeting Minutes for June 15
To: "Sally St. Amand" <sallystamand@yahoo.com>
CC: Peter Brown <peter@justbrown.net>, Rebekah Metz <metz_rebekah@bah.com>,
Joseph Chiusano <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>

Thank you Sally. These types of emails need to be sent to the open list
to maintain transparency.

Can you please repost to the list then we can discuss?

THanks

Duane

Sally St. Amand wrote:

> Duane
>
> I was looking over the minutes for our last TC concall. I do not think
> they accurately reflect what went on at the meeting.
>
> With respect to to the paragraph
>
> *Item 6:*
>
> Sub item 1 (SC part of core RM??) Peter: Use the procedure agreed
> today to discuss about the issue regarding SC. Peter will work with
> Joseph and Rebekah to derive wording, then propose vote via list server.
>
>
>
> My recollection was you asked that a notice be sent out on the list to
> solicit people to formulate the proposal. You did not say it
> explicitly, but the message I got was that the whole group would be
> asked who wanted to further address a sub-issue.
>
>
>
> I have a view on this issue and would like to participate in
> specifying it not just respond to an up or down vote. To this end I am
> copying Peter, Joe & Rebekah. And I suspect others have a view they
> want to express.
>
>
>
> Sally
>
>



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]