Re: [soa-rm] Revision and Clarifications of some PDs (reactions to JoeChuisano's comments)

[Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com>]

Re: 27 -> Hmm - I think just "agreed" is fine.  It doesn't always have 
to be "explicit", however it may have to be specific IMO.  Otherwise, we 
will end up with a huge set of artifacts for every service call.

Thanks

Duane

Peter F Brown wrote:

> Joe:
>  
> In 27, you are right: contract must specify that "something" has been 
> explicitly agreed between a set of entities. The clue to the possible 
> wording is in the PD for the previous Isuue, N° 26 "...When a specific 
> set of entities accept such a policy, a contract is usually 
> established.". I will re-word, and re-submit.
>