Re: [soa-rm] Issues #9-#23: My Comments

[Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com>]

Some additional comments:

Chiusano Joseph wrote:

> Here are my comments regarding issues #9-#23 (inclusive), as a result 
> of matching the PD against version 7B. I will send another set 
> shortly, beginning with issue #30.
> Issue #9: Do not concur.
> - Explanation: The sentence that was the basis for the comment is 
> still there verbatim (lines 323-324). The original comment had to do 
> with the fact that it is not entirely correct to say that a service 
> interface "specifies how to access the service" - this can be done in 
> documentation such as a user manual or some type of guide that 
> instructs developers on how to programatically access services from 
> within programming languages. The original comment recommended the 
> following improved wording: “The service interface specifies the 
> requirements for interacting with the service” (keep rest of sentence 
> as-is in version 7B).

DN - an interface is not by nature an artifact that specifies something. 
Rather, it is the end or touch point to something. Accordingly, the use 
of the word interface is somewhat confusing here.

> Issue #11: Concur.
> Issue #13: Still open - will discuss at F2F (per Ken during this 
> week's conference call)

DN - agreed.

>
>
D