RE: [soa-rm] Issues #9-#23: My Comments

["Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>]

> DN - an interface is not by nature an artifact that specifies 
> something. 
> Rather, it is the end or touch point to something. 
> Accordingly, the use of the word interface is somewhat confusing here.

Agreed - thanks Duane. We'll consider this issue as "needs rewording".

Kind Regards,
Joseph Chiusano
Booz Allen Hamilton
O: 703-902-6923
C: 202-251-0731
Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com] 
> Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 1:16 PM
> To: Chiusano Joseph
> Cc: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Issues #9-#23: My Comments
> 
> Some additional comments:
> 
> Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> 
> > Here are my comments regarding issues #9-#23 (inclusive), 
> as a result 
> > of matching the PD against version 7B. I will send another set 
> > shortly, beginning with issue #30.
> > Issue #9: Do not concur.
> > - Explanation: The sentence that was the basis for the comment is 
> > still there verbatim (lines 323-324). The original comment 
> had to do 
> > with the fact that it is not entirely correct to say that a service 
> > interface "specifies how to access the service" - this can 
> be done in 
> > documentation such as a user manual or some type of guide that 
> > instructs developers on how to programatically access services from 
> > within programming languages. The original comment recommended the 
> > following improved wording: "The service interface specifies the 
> > requirements for interacting with the service" (keep rest 
> of sentence 
> > as-is in version 7B).
> 
> DN - an interface is not by nature an artifact that specifies 
> something. 
> Rather, it is the end or touch point to something. 
> Accordingly, the use of the word interface is somewhat confusing here.
> 
> > Issue #11: Concur.
> > Issue #13: Still open - will discuss at F2F (per Ken during this 
> > week's conference call)
> 
> DN - agreed.
> 
> >
> >
> D
>