Re: [soa-rm] Called to a client meeting at 11:30 EST

["Gregory A. Kohring" <kohring@ccrl-nece.de>]

I will second Rebekah's motion.

-- Greg

Metz Rebekah wrote:
> Yes, thanks Duane.  
> 
> I would like to make this electronic motion....Do I need to do more than
> that to make it official?
> 
> Rebekah
> Rebekah Metz
> Associate
> Booz Allen Hamilton
> Voice:  (703) 377-1471
> Fax:     (703) 902-3457
> 
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com]
>>Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 5:31 PM
>>Cc: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
>>Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Called to a client meeting at 11:30 EST
>>
>>Rebekah:
>>
>>Thank you for the 'fore notice.
>>
>>WRT the meeting time, if you wish I can set up a poll with the
> 
> following
> 
>>options to see if there is consensus.
>>
>>Meeting:
>>
>>1. I am not in favour of changing the teleconference dates and times.
>>2. The current dates and times are not optimal for me.  I prefer
> 
> another
> 
>>day and time. [enter date and time preferred]
>>
>>If we get enough #2's (not necessarily over 50% but more than the
>>amounts of 1's), we can then ask for proposed day/time combinations.
>>
>>Would you like to make an electronic motion on the list to set this up
>>and see if it gets seconded?
>>
>>Duane
>>
>>Metz Rebekah wrote:
>>
>>
>>>TC -
>>>
>>>I unfortunately have been called into a client meeting at 11:30 this
>>>morning.  Although I will dial-in for the first few minutes of the
> 
> call
> 
>>>to say hello; I will not be able to participate in the discussions on
>>>the call today.
>>>
>>>I do hope that we discuss the timing and frequency of the conferences
>>>calls - at least get a poll of alternative times to hold this call.
> 
> I
> 
>>>am finding that many client meetings conflict with our current
> 
> timeslot.
> 
>>>
>>>I look forward to hearing you all again in the near future.
>>>
>>>Rebekah
>>>
>>>Rebekah Metz
>>>Associate
>>>Booz Allen Hamilton
>>>Voice:  (703) 377-1471
>>>Fax:     (703) 902-3457
>>>