Re: [soa-rm] Future content for Conf calls

[John Harby <jharby@gmail.com>]

+1

On 8/24/05, Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> wrote:
> Example:
> 
> An unnecessarily long discussion on suggested alternative dates (at
> least the portion that could be done prior to the meeting).  A
> discussion over the OASIS rules and procedures etc.
> 
> Both of these can probably be best done using the WIKI or list server or
> at least a substantial portion thereof.
> 
> Duane
> 
> Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> 
> >Sounds good to me Duane. For clarification, can you provide an example
> >of what would be considered administrivia (beyond taking roll call)?
> >
> >Joe
> >
> >Joseph Chiusano
> >Booz Allen Hamilton
> >O: 703-902-6923
> >C: 202-251-0731
> >Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com]
> >>Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 5:16 PM
> >>To: SOA-RM
> >>Subject: [soa-rm] Future content for Conf calls
> >>
> >>TC:
> >>
> >>Matt said something that tweaked my thinking a bit today.
> >>
> >>I would like to try and keep the use of the conference calls
> >>largely for technical work and confine administrivia to a
> >>minimum.  Perhaps most of this can be done via the list.
> >>
> >>Accordingly, I would look to the editing team and others to
> >>suggest topics that need to be discussed on the next calls.
> >>
> >>D.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>