OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

soa-rm message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Next F2F - Where to next?


Ok, fine. Whatever you say.

On 9/14/05, Matt MacKenzie <mattm@adobe.com> wrote:
John,
 
You've not attended the previous 2 face to face meetings either, so I don't consider your "no" vote consequential.
 
There is always only a subset of active members who will travel.  I'm interested in hearing from the people who will actually travel given the right circumstances.
 
-Matt


From: John Harby [mailto:jharby@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 2:53 PM
To: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org

Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Next F2F - Where to next?

I am on a very tight schedule here and can't travel so I vote

First choice: No F2F in 2005
Second choice: Anywhere with a dial-in supported

On 9/14/05, Matt MacKenzie <mattm@adobe.com> wrote:
I could do dec12-16, but I was hoping that we would get together as a TC
in the Oct. timeframe with the aim of making 08 a committee draft.

-matt

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Stiefel [mailto:development@reliablesoftware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 2:28 PM
To: peter@justbrown.net; soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Next F2F - Where to next?

First choice: I vote for December 12-16 in Vienna.
Second choice: no F2F in 2005.

Michael

At 09:28 AM 9/14/2005, Peter F Brown wrote:
>...both literally and figuratively.
>
>I have had 11 replies to my request for feedback, of which 8 indicated
>that they would in principle be able to attend a F2F meeting in Europe
>this Fall (plus 1 to join by confcall if available). Difficult to make
>projections based on such a small sample, although I'm going on the
>basis that those that reply are *more* likely to be the ones that would

>actually consider attending...
>
>Most of those plumped for Vienna rather than London, but the numbers
>suggest to me that we ought to pause before proceeding further.
>
>Recommendation to the TC
>------------------------
>The options to put to the TC would be, in order,
>
>A. Abandon hope of holding a F2F again in 2005; B. Opt for Vienna,
>12-16 or 16-19 December; C. Opt for Vienna, 14-17 October; D. Start
>looking for somewhere else, preferably for December;
>
>I would propose: the first of the proposals above to get support from
>10 members of the TC is the one we go with. If no proposal reaches that

>threshold by the next confcall, option A will be the default choice.
>
>Sorry, but I can't see another simple and quick way of resolving this.
>
>Peter






[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]