Re: [soa-rm] Next F2F - Where to next?

[Francis McCabe <frankmccabe@mac.com>]

I would also prefer an October meeting. I think that we can put this  
to bed by the end of the year if we give it a push now.
Frank

On Sep 14, 2005, at 5:05 PM, Duane Nickull wrote:

> I will only be able to attend via call (wife having baby) but will
> definitely be back in time for next F2F in 2006.
>
> Duane
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt MacKenzie [mailto:mattm@adobe.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 11:45 AM
> To: Michael Stiefel; peter@justbrown.net; soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [soa-rm] Next F2F - Where to next?
>
> I could do dec12-16, but I was hoping that we would get together as  
> a TC
> in the Oct. timeframe with the aim of making 08 a committee draft.
>
> -matt
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Stiefel [mailto:development@reliablesoftware.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 2:28 PM
> To: peter@justbrown.net; soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Next F2F - Where to next?
>
> First choice: I vote for December 12-16 in Vienna.
> Second choice: no F2F in 2005.
>
> Michael
>
> At 09:28 AM 9/14/2005, Peter F Brown wrote:
>
>> ...both literally and figuratively.
>>
>> I have had 11 replies to my request for feedback, of which 8  
>> indicated
>> that they would in principle be able to attend a F2F meeting in  
>> Europe
>> this Fall (plus 1 to join by confcall if available). Difficult to  
>> make
>> projections based on such a small sample, although I'm going on the
>> basis that those that reply are *more* likely to be the ones that  
>> would
>>
>
>
>> actually consider attending...
>>
>> Most of those plumped for Vienna rather than London, but the numbers
>> suggest to me that we ought to pause before proceeding further.
>>
>> Recommendation to the TC
>> ------------------------
>> The options to put to the TC would be, in order,
>>
>> A. Abandon hope of holding a F2F again in 2005; B. Opt for Vienna,
>> 12-16 or 16-19 December; C. Opt for Vienna, 14-17 October; D. Start
>> looking for somewhere else, preferably for December;
>>
>> I would propose: the first of the proposals above to get support from
>> 10 members of the TC is the one we go with. If no proposal reaches  
>> that
>>
>
>
>> threshold by the next confcall, option A will be the default choice.
>>
>> Sorry, but I can't see another simple and quick way of resolving  
>> this.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>
>
>