Subject: RE: [soa-rm] JtC = cross post solution (was) ... Re: The real SOA challenge?
[Replying on SOA-RM TC list only] Let me be the first to say that I think a "service-oriented architecture joint committee" is an *excellent* idea. Joe Joseph Chiusano Associate Booz Allen Hamilton 700 13th St. NW Washington, DC 20005 O: 202-508-6514 C: 202-251-0731 Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com > -----Original Message----- > From: James Bryce Clark [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] > Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 1:46 PM > To: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; > email@example.com; > firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com > Subject: [soa-rm] JtC = cross post solution (was) ... Re: The > real SOA challenge? > > 1. Reply to Joe and John: I hope so. > 2. Request to all: This interesting but long thread is > going on in five e-mail lists. These TCs have much in > common, that properly is a basis for further chat, but while > maintaining the separate and independent activities of each > TC. I would like to suggest a solution. It would take some > duplicate traffic off these lists, and provide a place for > these cross-TC, SOA-oriented coordination conversations. > I suggest that these 5 TCs consider starting a "service > architecture joint committee." The rules of that OASIS > structure can be found at > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#2.16. It > does not require any surrender of each committee's own work > plan or views, but would provide a forum for discussion of > possible voluntary coordination. I will take this up further > with your committee chairs, and discuss what kind of > charter/outline might work. If the TCs (or some subset of > them) wish to do so, a JtC would create a place where matters > of joint interest can be more effectively discussed. > Regards Jamie > > ~ James Bryce Clark > ~ Director, Standards Development, OASIS > ~ firstname.lastname@example.org > > At 08:39 AM 11/17/2005, Chiusano Joseph wrote: > >>From: John Hardin [mailto:email@example.com] > >>Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 10:29 AM > >>* * * > >>We are working these three items into the next generation > of the OASIS > >>Technical Architecture. > > > >I believe you meant to say "ebXML Technical Architecture"? > >Joe > >