[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [soa-rm] comments collected from SOA-RM presentation
Personally I’d be against this as a
definition as it’s tied to software type considerations rather than
business ones. It’s more a description (IMO) of component based
development than SOA, in particular if you consider a person being able to
offer a solution it’s a bit tricky to consider them “distributed
anywhere” or “owned by anyone”. This implies both that
service has no temporal information, and that ownership of a service doesn’t
alter its behaviour. From:
Michael Stiefel [mailto:development@reliablesoftware.com] According to this definition 3. Possible one line description of
SOA: A modular design of solutions where the modules are distributed
anywhere, owned by anyone, and reused by everyone (in a manner consistent with
specified constraints and policies, including those which limit access).
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]