Re: [soa-rm] Public Review Comment

[Ken Laskey <klaskey@mitre.org>]

Well, one could argue that the point of the RM is to identify and  
describe concepts independent of specific uses, so the blueprints  
should make sure they consistently use the terms and relationships in  
the RM.

;-)

Ken

P.S. If you need a concept that is not in the RM or felt to come under  
the RA, this is definitely the time to bring that up.  Most things I've  
seen suggested are on the RA list.


On Mar 27, 2006, at 2:01 PM, Miko Matsumura wrote:

> Yes, that's the plan, hence the need to ensure RM "sematic  
> interoperability" i.e. want to make sure the things referenced in RM  
> are compatible with any blueprinting efforts underway...
>
> Miko
>
> 	-----Original Message-----
> 	From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com]
> 	Sent: Thu 3/23/2006 10:27 AM
> 	To: Miko Matsumura; klaskey@mitre.org
> 	Cc: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
> 	Subject: RE: [soa-rm] Public Review Comment
> 	
> 	
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
------------------
Ken Laskey
MITRE Corporation, M/S H305     phone:  703-983-7934
7515 Colshire Drive                        fax:        703-983-1379
McLean VA 22102-7508