[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] comments collected from SOA-RM presentation
A big part of the difference is what makes up the modules. In the distributed object approaches, what is distributed are data objects for which you need to know the structural details in order to wire them together. In SOA, the modules are functional blocks. In order to interact, we are actually saying you need a lot more information than you did for objects (e.g. semantics, policies, ...) but the information itself can be modularly defined -- the semantics come from the vocabulary documented over there, the policy is the privacy one used by that community. The issues related to ownership make it more of a social contract than a technical one -- I am depending on someone else to create and maintain a "product" I need. Note, I am not trying to rewrite our RM description. I think it is good and concise but I'm looking for different hooks, different ways to say things when the "formal" words need some backup. Ken On Mar 27, 2006, at 10:16 PM, Michael Stiefel wrote: The given definition fits almost every form of software. --- Ken Laskey MITRE Corporation, M/S H305 phone: 703-983-7934 7515 Colshire Drive fax: 703-983-1379 McLean VA 22102-7508 |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]