[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [soa-rm] Greater SOA-RM Visibility is Needed!
One more thing – our messaging
should include the fact that the RM can be mapped to many technology families,
but we should emphasize WS-* as one for sure. D ******************************* From: Jeffrey A
Estefan [mailto:Jeffrey.A.Estefan@jpl.nasa.gov] Duane and the SOA-RM TC, I'm attending the Ground System Architectures Workshop
(GSAW) in My point is that each and every speaker this morning used a
different lexicon for defining SOA and none of them acknowledged or even made
reference to the OASIS SOA-RM. I think we need to do some better job
marketing this work. Do the OASIS By-Laws allow us to do this? We
[this body of work] needs much more visibility whether in various industry
rags, user group forums, consortia, etc. This is particularly true
in the Government contexts (i.e., Military, Civil, and Intel space communities)
that I witnessed today. Would like to hear your thoughts on how we might address
this problem. Regards... - Jeff Estefan, JPL |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]