RE: [soa-rm] resolution for 513

["Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>]

FWIW, I didn't see any contradiction. The second sentence states that we
show the relationship between the RM and standards in general, while the
first clarifies that we will not go beyond talking about standards in
this general manner (the relationship between the RM and standards)
within the RM.

Joe 

Joseph Chiusano
Associate
Booz Allen Hamilton
 
700 13th St. NW, Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005
O: 202-508-6514  
C: 202-251-0731
Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Don Flinn [mailto:flinn@alum.mit.edu] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 1:37 PM
To: Duane Nickull
Cc: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] resolution for 513

Duane 

Doesn't your second sentence contradict your first sentence?

I don't see your mail re: the concept maps.  Did you send it to the
list?

Don 

On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 08:46 -0700, Duane Nickull wrote:
> Yes - standards are important but the RM is abstract and hence not the

> place to mention any specific standards.  We do show the relationship 
> between the RM and specific standards, protocols and technologies in
figure 1 - line 134.
> 
> *******************************
> Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT  
> http://www.uncefact.org/ Chair - OASIS SOA Reference Model Technical 
> Committee Personal Blog - http://technoracle.blogspot.com/
> *******************************
> 
> 
--
Don Flinn
President, Flint Security LLC
Tel: 781-856-7230
Fax: 781-631-7693
e-mail: flinn@alum.mit.edu
http://flintsecurity.com