RE: [soa-rm] Tomorrow's meeting

["Bashioum, Christopher D" <cbashioum@mitre.org>]

Attached is my wording for issue 523(2):

 

add the following sentence between lines 166 and 167:

"In this document, unless otherwise indicated, the term 'architecture' is used in place of the term 'architectural description' for brevity. 

 

Add to lines 803-805 the following: "The term architecture in this document refers to an architectural description, or architectural model, which is a set of artifacts ...."

 

Move lines 806-807 (software architecture and its definition) to be its own glossary term, since it is defined differently than architecture. 

 

In line 851, replace the work "predetermined" with "general"

 

 

Don  - do I need to do anything in particular to get this into the list?

---

From: Ken Laskey [mailto:klaskey@mitre.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 2:41 PM
To: Duane Nickull
Cc: Don Flinn; soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Tomorrow's meeting

Following issues have not generated any opposition and PDs have received some email comment and support as revised

535

536

537

538

539

I request issue 523 be broken out as six issues aligning with six comments as submitted.  This will make it easier to respond than as 17 issues (541-557).  See attached including clarification from commenter where text appears to be cut off.

523(1) - no change, response needs to be sent to commenter based on DN and KL responses

523(2) - Chris B formulating text addition

523(3) - no change, response needs to be sent to commenter based on DN and KL responses, but need to bring cardinality discussion to closure

523(4) - no change, response needs to be sent to commenter based on DN and KL responses, but need to bring cardinality discussion to closure

523(5) - no change, response needs to be sent to commenter based on DN and KL responses, but need to bring cardinality discussion to closure

523(6) - additions have been made to shared state text; note this in response to be sent to commenter

Ken