[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [soa-rm] No vote for SOA-RM
This list not only includes
the kitchen sink but every dirty dish that was runored to be in it. A
quick look shows he still has WSDL 1.2 as current and there may be other
aberrations, but keeping such a list up to date would be a full time job.
Talking about all of this in a reference model would have SOA-RM being an
encyclopedia.
But I'll be interested if and how he
responds to Duane's email.
Ken From: Jeffrey A. Estefan [mailto:jeffrey.a.estefan@jpl.nasa.gov] Sent: Thu 9/21/2006 1:51 PM To: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [soa-rm] No vote for SOA-RM Duane,
Does it really matter if we get a couple of NO
votes? I'm not familiar with the OASIS requirements on whether formal spec
adoption as an official OASIS Standard requires a unanimous YES vote or
not.
Incidentally, the Momentum folks are the ones who
stood up the following site:
If you look at the list of SOA-related
terms/contents at this link:
you can see where Jeff S. may be coming from in
terms of completeness. I came across this material a couple of years
ago. Also note that Jeff S. is the CEO of Momentum.
Cheers...
- Jeff |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]