[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [soa-rm] Result of Voting on SOA-RM v1.0 as OASIS Standard
+1 Can we get a full list of those who voted? Do we need to give a reasoned reply to the no-voter: maybe I missed it, but did we consider that he had a valid reason, or do we stick to the formulation that his concern is noted but that we maintain that the spec is complete in accordance with its prescribed scope? Peter -----Original Message----- From: Jones, Steve G [mailto:steve.g.jones@capgemini.com] Sent: 02 October 2006 10:58 To: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: FW: [soa-rm] Result of Voting on SOA-RM v1.0 as OASIS Standard I propose we submit to full specification. One negative vote against 89 positives is a pretty ringing endorsement in anyone's book. Particularly given the comment on the no vote I don't see why we wouldn't shift to standard. Steve -----Original Message----- From: Mary McRae [mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org] Sent: 02 October 2006 00:25 To: members@lists.oasis-open.org; tc-announce@lists.oasis-open.org Cc: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [soa-rm] Result of Voting on SOA-RM v1.0 as OASIS Standard OASIS members: The ballots for approval of Reference Model for Service Oriented Architecture v1.0 as an OASIS Standard (announced at [1]) has closed. There were sufficient affirmative votes to approve the specification. However, because there was a negative vote, the SOA Reference Model Technical Committee must decide how to proceed, as provided in the OASIS TC Process, at http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#3.4. A further announcement will be made to this list regarding their disposition of the vote. Mary [1] http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/members/200609/msg00002.html --------------------------------------------------- Mary P McRae Manager of TC Administration, OASIS email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org web: www.oasis-open.org This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]