Re: [soa-rm] Result of Voting on SOA-RM v1.0 as OASIS Standard

[Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com>]

Guys:

We need to take a formal response to this.  I have already started.  I
actually sent him an email via the Kavi system (for auditability) pointing
out the following an formally requesting more information:

0. I explained the process the TC must undergo if we have a no vote.

1. I noted that his reason for voting no were deemed (by myself)
insufficient with respect to the reasons.  I informed him of the process and
formally requested more detail to fully explain his rationale to the TC so
they can consider whether or not his position is sufficient to justify us
not advancing the specification to a full OASIS standard.  I informed him
that as chair, I am completely neutral and here to facilitate the formal
process.

2. In duly informed him in this email that without providing additional
statements, the TC would no likely have enough information to justify not
advancing it.

3. I also suggested that his comment on the official ballot validated the
requirement for a reference model and that while the RM may not be 100% in
compliance with his terms, it still helps him out since he now has a point
of reference to explain where his SOA is different.

I will take the initiative to send a follow up email to him directly via
Kavi and make a second request.  I feel that given he has had one week
already, a second week is very liberal.  I will nevertheless try tot
establish contact and invite him to our next meeting to provide further
details of his dissent.  Accordingly, this Wednesday's agenda will provide a
portion of time for him to fulfill that obligation.

Duane

On 10/2/06 5:20 AM, "Tom Merkle" <TMerkle@capwin.org> wrote:

> In all fairness, I propose we allow the "no" voter one week to provide a
> detailed analysis of what they consider is wrong or missing with the
> SOA-RM specification. If no new information is provided then we move the
> specification to a standard.
> 
> 
> Regards,
>  
> Tom Merkle
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jones, Steve G [mailto:steve.g.jones@capgemini.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 4:58 AM
> To: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: FW: [soa-rm] Result of Voting on SOA-RM v1.0 as OASIS Standard
> 
> 
> I propose we submit to full specification.  One negative vote against 89
> positives is a pretty ringing endorsement in anyone's book.
> Particularly given the comment on the no vote I don't see why we
> wouldn't shift to standard.
> 
> Steve
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mary McRae [mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org]
> Sent: 02 October 2006 00:25
> To: members@lists.oasis-open.org; tc-announce@lists.oasis-open.org
> Cc: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [soa-rm] Result of Voting on SOA-RM v1.0 as OASIS Standard
> 
> OASIS members:
> 
> The ballots for approval of Reference Model for Service Oriented
> Architecture v1.0 as an OASIS Standard (announced at [1]) has closed.
> There were sufficient affirmative votes to approve the specification.
> However, because there was a negative vote, the SOA Reference Model
> Technical Committee must decide how to proceed, as provided in the OASIS
> TC Process, at http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#3.4. A
> further announcement will be made to this list regarding their
> disposition of the vote.
> 
> Mary
> 
> [1] http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/members/200609/msg00002.html
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Mary P McRae
> Manager of TC Administration, OASIS
> email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
> web: www.oasis-open.org
> 
> 
> This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential
> and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the
> person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient,
> you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate,
> distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this
> message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all
> copies of this message.
> 

-- 
******************************************************
Sr. Technical Evangelist - Adobe Systems, Inc.       *
Chair - OASIS SOA Reference Model Technical Committee*
Blog: http://technoracle.blogspot.com                *
******************************************************