[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [soa-rm] SOA-RAF errata
The changes were made to Working Draft 6 (WD6) in preparation for WD7 of 4 May 2012, copy attached for info. Ken and I had an instruction from the group (25 April 2012) to remodel several diagrams, including the then figure 10 and 33 (which corresponds to the copy you
have below) with a new one, which was also then used as figure 33. See page 33 of the attached file. This arose out of an issue raised by Zoran Milosevic about the inconsistency of wording that followed the diagram. He had proposed
modelling “behaviour” as part of this figure but we agreed not to model that. See also:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/soa-rm-ra/email/archives/201205/msg00009.html
That’s the best trace that I can find. Regards, Peter From: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Ken Laskey I was working with the SOA-RAF and noticed Figures 10 and 33 were the same. If we go back to csprd02, the latter figure is the following: I believe this figure makes more sense in context. If we agree as a committee, we need to look into the formal errata process, first identifying errata and then fixing the glitches. Please consider and let’s discuss tomorrow. Ken ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
Attachment:
soa-raf-v1.0-wd06-20120425.doc
Description: soa-raf-v1.0-wd06-20120425.doc
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]