[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [soa-tel] UPDATE: Re: 2 Liaison Statements approved fromSOA-TEL and Telecom MS SC to be sent to destination
Michael I am OK with the changes you propose. So ok for me if you amend and use the amended LS. I guess then that it should be you who “delivers” the LS to OMA. Mary is that correct? Of course this change means that the relationship will be between OMA (in general) and SOATEL TC. The TMS (and its SC) will not be
formally involved, but of course informed of the evolution. I started all this from a SC meeting so that is why the SC was involved and mentioned. This is OK for me. Nevertheless I suggest that at least one of the 2 chairs of SOATEL (John, Mike) agree as well on the new text. The intent of all
this is to help SOATEL get contributions. Then at the next SOATEL meeting on apr 21st a resume can be made for the meeting. One last point. If this is the path to follow (i.e. TC to TC, Mary pls confirm) then also the LS to W3CRA must be modified along
the lines of what proposed by Michael. So the appointed LS rep for W3C (Orit? Li? See my points below) should make changes accordingly. Enrico From: Brenner, Michael Ralf (Michael)
[mailto:mrbrenner@alcatel-lucent.com] Hi Enrico, Just saw your response to Mary’s message. Yes, of course on the statements you made regarding to being able to send the OMA LS. But I
think we should accept the editorial changes I proposed. Since those are all editorials, and I am the editor, I think I am automatically given that responsibility. But if at least somebody else (you, others) in SOA-Tel would like to read the editorial changes
I made, it would be better. If that happens soon, I will still be abkle to send the LS out in time for it to be processed by OMA in their upcoming meeting – April 19-24. Thanks and regards, Michael From: Brenner, Michael Ralf (Michael)
Thanks Mary. SOA-Tel Chairs, and all members: I think we can consider I was appointed, since you agreed with the LS to OMA. I am a member of the SOA-Tel and I am a member of the OMA.
Given this, I think there is no other process-related issue that would hinder me to send this to OMA. But I suggest to strip from the text the words that would imply this is done on the part of the TMS, and only leave those words related to SOA-Tel. The fact
that SOA-Tel introduces broader TMS role, is OK I think – does not contravene the OASIS process. Attached a version of the LS from which I stripped my affiliation with TMS. Please review and advise. If I am given the go-ahead to send it out, I will accept the changes first. Regards, Michael From: Mary McRae [mailto: To Members of the SOA for Telecom Technical Committee: There are two classes of liaison relationships defined by the OASIS Liaison Policy: Organizational Liaisons and TC Liaisons. In this particular case you should be operating
in the TC Liaison mode. The exact policy is here: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/liaison_policy.php#liaisons Note that it requires appointing a Member of the Technical Committee who should also be a Member of the organization with which the TC wishes to form a relationship.
That Member then becomes the conduit of communication between the two groups. The Liaison relationship does not allow participation by non-OASIS Members on OASIS Technical Committees, nor vice versa. There is currently no ability for a Member Section to establish a liaison relationship with any other entity; only Technical Committees can create such relationships. If the TC has not yet done so, it should nominate and appoint a Member of the TC to be the liaison to each of the referenced groups (W3C-RA and OMA). In each case, that
person should be a member of that organization and eligible to participate in their work. That individual would then be the conduit for passing these requests to the other organizations. Please feel free to contact me if further clarification is needed or if you have any other questions. Best regards, Mary Mary P McRae Director, Technical Committee Administration OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org web: www.oasis-open.org twitter: fiberartisan phone: 1.603.232.9090 On Apr 8, 2009, at 2:23 PM, Mary McRae wrote: Buongiorno Enrico, I have just returned from a short vacation and am reviewing the liaison notices you provided. For each organization the process is slightly different; I want to make
sure these are handled appropriately. I will do my best to process these as quickly as possible. Best regards, Mary Mary P McRae Director, Technical Committee Administration OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org web: www.oasis-open.org twitter: fiberartisan phone: 1.603.232.9090 On Apr 7, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Ronco Enrico wrote: Hello In the SOA TEL TC and
They are attached, the word file for OMA, the ZIP for W3C-RA I am a bit new to all this but I suppose I need to send such LSs to you for you to officially send them to the appropriate bodies. If so can you confirm me that it is exact? If not can you indicate me what steps to follow in the OASIS procedures and who to contact
in order to get these LSs to destination? They are a bit urgent, especially the one for W3C-RA I remain waiting for your kind response Best regards ------------------------------------------------------------------ IT Innovation + 39 335 7669642
<LS-from-OASIS-TMS-SOA-Tel-to-W3C-WS-RA v1.zip><LS-OASIS-TMS&.doc;SOA-Tel-for-OMA-final.doc><logo Ambiente_foglia.jpg>
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]