[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [stdsreg] agenda for StdsReg mtg #10, 9 July
Dear Colleagues A first surely incomplete list of possible "hosting" organizations and some pros and cons: A FORMAL ROUTE 1 ISO (including ISO/IEC JTC1) PRO - THE formal standards body in this field. Adoption as an ISO Standard would give the registry spec. sufficient cachet to encourage widespread adoption especially amongst formal bodies CON - Process. Either the members of an existing TC would have to be encouraged to adopt a NWI proposal, OR a PAS-submitter would have be similarly encouraged, OR an ISO Member or "A" liaison body would have to be encouraged to submit a fast-track solution. CON - Time. Even a fast track would take quite a long time, even when the process had started. 2 CEN plus ANSI PRO - "regional" adoption might or might not be easier. Some processes and deliverables might be faster and more informal. CON - process and time again. Also, would need to be adopted in more than one "region" to have proper credibility. 3 A relevant consortium Mentioned - OASIS, Dublin Core, others? PRO - faster than a formal body, MAYBE easier CON - more likely reservations about "ownership" therefore perhaps less "buy-in" B INFORMAL ROUTE 1 UN-ECE/ISO/IEC/ITU-T eBusiness MoU Steering Group PRO - brings together major players in the key ICT arena, could serve as a springboard to a more formal publication, OASIS (and hopefully CEN/ISSS in future) are signatories CON - confined to eBusiness, no formal authority 2 ANSI/ISSB plus ICT Standards Board PRO - ICT "co-ordinating committees" involving a number of key organizations including major consortia, informal "publication places" that are long-term bodies, could serve as a springboard to a more formal publication, ANSI and CEN/ISSS were going to involve them anyway CON - no formal authority over members 3 ITSIG PRO - specialists in ISO community including from national members, might stand some chance of aceptance CON - confined to ISO and liaison-type issues; no consortia involvement 4... ??? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Best regards John Ketchell Director, CEN/ISSS - Information Society Standardization System URL:http://www.cenorm.be/isss Rue de Stassart, 36 email (direct) john.ketchell@cenorm.be B-1050 Brussels email (secretariat) isss@cenorm.be Belgium Tel (direct) + 32 2 550 08 46 Fax + 32 2 550 09 66 Tel (secretariat) + 32 2 550 08 13 Tel (GSM) +32 475 594 828
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC