OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

stdsreg message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: RE: [stdsreg] agenda for StdsReg mtg #10, 9 July


Dear Colleagues

A first surely incomplete list of possible "hosting" organizations and some
pros and cons:

A	FORMAL ROUTE

1	ISO (including ISO/IEC JTC1)

PRO - THE formal standards body in this field.  Adoption as an ISO Standard
would give the registry spec. sufficient cachet to encourage widespread
adoption especially amongst formal bodies

CON - Process.  Either the members of an existing TC would have to be
encouraged to adopt a NWI proposal, OR a PAS-submitter would have be
similarly encouraged, OR an ISO Member or "A" liaison body would have to be
encouraged to submit a fast-track solution.

CON - Time.  Even a fast track would take quite a long time, even when the
process had started.

2	CEN plus ANSI

PRO - "regional" adoption might or might not be easier.  Some processes and
deliverables might be faster and more informal.

CON - process and time again.  Also, would need to be adopted in more than
one "region" to have proper credibility.

3	A relevant consortium

Mentioned - OASIS, Dublin Core, others?

PRO - faster than a formal body, MAYBE easier

CON - more likely reservations about "ownership" therefore perhaps less
"buy-in"

B	INFORMAL ROUTE

1	UN-ECE/ISO/IEC/ITU-T eBusiness MoU Steering Group

PRO - brings together major players in the key ICT arena, could serve as a
springboard to a more formal publication, OASIS (and hopefully CEN/ISSS in
future) are signatories

CON - confined to eBusiness, no formal authority

2	ANSI/ISSB plus ICT Standards Board

PRO - ICT "co-ordinating committees" involving a number of key organizations
including major consortia, informal "publication places" that are long-term
bodies, could serve as a springboard to a more formal publication, ANSI and
CEN/ISSS were going to involve them anyway

CON - no formal authority over members

3	ITSIG

PRO - specialists in ISO community including from national members, might
stand some chance of aceptance

CON - confined to ISO and liaison-type issues;  no consortia involvement

4...	???

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Best regards
John Ketchell
Director, CEN/ISSS - Information Society Standardization System

URL:http://www.cenorm.be/isss

Rue de Stassart, 36	email (direct) john.ketchell@cenorm.be
B-1050 Brussels	email (secretariat) isss@cenorm.be
Belgium	                        Tel (direct) + 32 2 550 08 46
Fax + 32 2 550 09 66	Tel (secretariat) + 32 2 550 08 13
Tel (GSM) +32 475 594 828



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC