[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [stdsreg] minutes of StdsReg mtg 25 February
Minutes of the Standards Registry Committee conference call #18, 25 February 2003 (submitted by John Ketchell) (Call hosted by OASIS) 1. Introduction Roll call and welcome. Attendance: Karl Best (Chair), Karen Boehme, Bob Hager, John Ketchell The agenda was approved (N043). 2. Approval of record of previous meeting, 4 February (N042) The record was approved with spelling corrections: Roy Gates" should be "Ray Gates" and "Farrance" should be "Farance". Comments by Ray Gates on the ISO process were noted. 3. Review of the status of the public review Bob welcomed the fact that he had additional help with this activity from Tracy, a library specialist at ANSI. He had already submitted the raw comments to the Committee, and Tracy had now grouped these by type of comment, and was refining their presentation, with a numbering system, etc. This enhanced synthesis would be ready in a day or two. There was discussion about how to handle the comments, given the lack of current participation. A number of different options seemed possible. The simplest course might be for us to hand the comments directly to the ISO editor rather than to resolve the comments in a new edition of the specification. Bob noted that, since the comments were already being intended to be fed into the JTC1 process during the current ballot, it would be useful to submit the comment synthesis in any event. It was agreed that the Committee should examine the enhanced synthesis and try to agree whether it was coherent and included all the observations made, before it was submitted to ISO. (ACTION 18/1: Bob to despatch enhanced synthesis for review in a few days). 4. Review of submission to ISO/IEC JTC1 There were still a search for a document editor, but Bob had this in hand. Bob would keep a close eye on the ISO process as it progressed further. 5. Discussion: drop deliverables 2 and 3 from our Charter? The participants agreed there was probably an insufficient participation currently to continue the Committee actively after the above action on the comments had been completed. One additional telephone conference was proposed in order to finalise this. It might be useful to compare notes by e-mail after around six months experience of implementation amongst those making trials, but otherwise it was suggested the Committee be discontinued, and the ongoing process be left with ISO/IEC JTC1. 6. Any other business None 7. Schedule next meeting and solicit host Bob will send out a synthesis of the comments received in the next few days; committee memebrs will have until the next meeting to review the comments. At the next meeting the committee will approve (or not) the comments to be submitted to ISO, which, together with the already submitted specification will complete our handoff of materials. At that point the committee's work would be complete, and the committee may vote to close. The next and possibly final conference would be held on 12 March at the usual time. ANSI will host the meeting. Karen would send her comments by e-mail as she was unable to attend.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC