Re: [tab-askthetab] [Fwd: [askthetab] errata question] - Question 2

[Mary McRae <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>]

I've actually already sent a reply to him - will forward to askthetab list. while in general "what makes for a substantive change" or "how to handle errata" would be a good thing for the TAB to create, this really was a "here's the TC Process rule and an example" which I answered.

On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com> wrote:

If it breaks backwards compatibility it would be substantive.

If they have schema examples of what they want to change from and to that would be good to illustrate.

 

Martin.

 

From: William Cox [mailto:wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com]
Sent: 14 January 2009 20:34
To: Ask The TAB
Subject: [tab-askthetab] [Fwd: [askthetab] errata question] - Question 2

 

This is Question 2. I'll put it in the archives later today.

bill

--
William Cox
Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com
Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com
+1 862 485 3696 mobile
+1 908 277 3460 fax

-- 
Mary P McRae
Manager of TC Administration, OASIS
mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
voip: 603.232.9090