Fwd: [tag-comment] Comments - Follow-up

[Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>]

Copied to the list for the record.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
Date: 15 April 2010 08:30
Subject: Re: [tag-comment] Comments - Follow-up
To: "Jacques R. Durand" <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com>


On 15 April 2010 00:51, Jacques R. Durand <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Dave:
>
> Following-up on your main comment:
>
>>2. Where might I find the semantics for the elements in TAML,
>>for instance I'm sat here wondering what content belongs in
> testAssertion element...
> Nothing in the guidelines,
> No definition of the element which tells me what it should contain in
> testassertionmarkuplanguage-1.0.html
> Where might an end user find such information?
>
> We plan to address it as follows:
>
> 1- in the "test assertions model" document, more semantics and examples
> for each construct. This means also about contents of these constructs.
> See an example for "Test Assertion" top-level construct, in attached pdf
> (proposed additions are in red).

Which basically means this document is not stand-alone.
It should be rejected on that basis alone.



> So that would be addressed both at TA Model doc level and the TA markup
> doc level. The TA guidelines will remain as is, its goal being to guide
> how to use the TA model to define test assertions  (more of a modeling
> guide).
>
> Would that address your comment?
>

Quite simply no. If this document needs another to make it complete,
then integrate the two to produce something usable by the reader.


regards

--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk



-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk