Re: [tag-discuss] the role of an XML mark-up for TAs

["Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com>]

On 22/11/06, Carmelo Montanez <carmelo@nist.gov> wrote:

> >Which raises the pre-conditions again.
> >If a test M is expected to be run after test L and prior to test N
> >then such selection metadata must recognise this.
>
>
> Agreed although test cases should be independent of one another
> whenever possible
I found that to be a minimum number of cases!


>or when interaction is part of the  test scenario.

Frequently that doesn't preclude sequenced tests.
Murphys law works well in testing :-)

regards
-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk