[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [tag-discuss] Re: Draft Charter (Was: surviving the winter break)
Inline -jacques -----Original Message----- From: david_marston@us.ibm.com [mailto:david_marston@us.ibm.com] Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 4:37 PM To: tag-discuss@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [tag-discuss] Re: Draft Charter (Was: surviving the winter break) I don't have any fatal objections, but I would like to see some clarifications. 1. Are the deliverables intended to be an OASIS Standard? I notice that the charter only says that they will be sent to the TAB for approval. <JD> I think they should be at least committee specification. Should they be pushed as an OASIS standard? I don't have a strong opinion on this. In my mind, a guideline status is sufficient, but I could see an XML mark-up becoming standard (although it might not be as consensual as the guideline part...). Because of the nature of this work, I would not rush to standardize and instead wait for many to use it first. 2. The part about the test harness ("...characterization of the test environment or test harness assumed...") may be scary to some people. Could this be worded to say that "if necessary," some "minimal assumptions" may be expressed? <JD> agree we need to find a better way to convey the notion that its OK for the TC to add some test harness considerations in a TA guide, since in many cases at least, it is not possible to make entirely abstraction of this when writing TAs. But it is really on the edge of the scope... 3. I think in pure form, the TAs won't require "refinement of the definitions of concepts" from prior work, but describing the practical usage of TAs should be integrated into the prior work and may indeed require such refinement. In that light, the TAs are closely related to test outcomes (pass, fail, precondition not met, etc.), and that concept should get mentioned on the list of "external" concepts. Again, I think this comes out in discussing practical usage rather than the theory of TAs. <JD> sounds right. If you have a better wording to convey this, all right. There may be a few other bits that make me slightly uncomfortable, but I think they are subsumed under my assumption that the TC would act in good faith under the proposed charter that makes clear that TAs are one part of a larger effort. <JD> the draft is open to rewording - the challenge is to try to outline a scope that proves not too restrictive in the long term, yet gives enough assurance that the TC will remain focused on the main topic. .................David Marston --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tag-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: tag-discuss-help@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]