tag-discuss message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: TA definition: one more try
- From: "Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com>
- To: <tag-discuss@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 17:22:58 -0800
Trying to blend
the latest proposals on TA definition, in the blurb we had before (e.g. it
appears that the term implementation should be replaced with "item under
test"):
" A test
assertion (TA), also sometimes defined as test specification, is understood in
this charter with the following general meaning:
A TA always refers to an item under test (IUT), either implicitly or explicit if it is necessary that the TA identifies the item in some unambiguous manner.
A
TA describes the expected output or behavior for the
item under test within specific operation conditions, in a way that can
be measured or tested.
A TA may refer to
an abstract test harness architecture that characterizes test components in terms of their interaction with
the IUT.
Each test
assertion is an independent, complete, testable statement for requirements in
the specification. Test assertions are generally different from test cases,
which are more detailed and contingent to a concrete test framework: TAs are the
basis to write test cases, and relate the latter to the narrative of the target
specification."
DOes that
satisfy everyone - at least for a charter definition
?
NOTE: the
"Test Metadata" W3C doc talks of "testable assertions" which I think is not the
same as TA here... right Patrick? (fearing to open a new can of worms
here...)
-Jacques
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]