Re: [tag-discuss] TA definition: one more try

["Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com>]

On 03/02/07, Serm Kulvatunyou <serm@nist.gov> wrote:
> Jacques,
>
> I think instead of removing it may be adding the term 'sufficient' "A TA may
> refer to an abstract test harness architecture sufficient to characterize
> test components in terms of their interaction with the IUT."
>
> Coming from the IIC, I think we understand what entails the non-abstract
> test harness.

If the IIC were forming this group I might agree.
Since I've never heard of them, I object to the term abstract.

regards

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk