[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [tag-discuss] A charter
Here is openOffice2.0 and PDF versions. See in red the changes in TA defs that, I believe, should accommodate all concerns... - test envt. Description is not "abstract" anymore, instead the TA def allows for it to be limited to "interactions" with IUT, which I think is Serm main concern. I agree that "abstract" is rather vague. - Cho: "item under test" is now said "assumed to implement all or part of the target spec". Hope that is sufficient for those who point out that "implementation" is more common in the litterature out there? Again, the TA def may be refined later - the most important in a charter is that it must be good enough to scope the TC work on TAs (common understanding of what TAs are about). -Jacques -----Original Message----- From: Dave Pawson [mailto:dave.pawson@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 12:12 AM To: Durand, Jacques R. Cc: tag-discuss@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [tag-discuss] A charter On 03/02/07, Durand, Jacques R. <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com> wrote: > The charter draft includes the following changes compared to previous > draft (1/5). Let me know if you want another format than MSWord: No thanks. I'm Linux based. Open office or HTML? Even plain text? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]