[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [tag] Meeting schedules: some PROPOSAL
Stephen: Right. I think I was off + or - 1h on some locations with my previous schedules... The call tomorrow is Schedule A: San Francisco: Wednesday, June 6, 2007 at 10:00:00 AM UTC-7 hours PDT New York (U.S.A. - New York): Wednesday, June 6, 2007 at 1:00:00 PM UTC-4 hours EDT London (U.K. - England): Wednesday, June 6, 2007 at 6:00:00 PM UTC+1 hour BST Saint-Peterburg (Russia): Wednesday, June 6, 2007 at 9:00:00 PM UTC+4 hours So far, our 2 (summer time) schedules are: (will post these on wiki) ------------ schedule A ------------------------------------------ (S-A) Wednesday: (9pm StPetersb, [1am Beijing, 2am Seoul], 10am California, 1pm EastCoast, 6pm UK) - out of range for: Seoul, Beijing, ------------ schedule B' ------------------------------------------ (S-B') (new alternate call) Wednesday in US: (8am StPetersb, noon Beijing, 1pm Seoul, 9pm California, [midnight EastCoast, 5am UK,] ) - out of range for: EastCoast, UK ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wed June 6: Schedule A Wed June 13 (Thu in EU/Russia): Schedule B Thanks for the worldclock link which is posted on the wiki. -Jacques -----Original Message----- From: stephen.green@systml.co.uk [mailto:stephen.green@systml.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 2:47 AM To: tag@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [tag] Meeting schedules: some PROPOSAL Greetings Just to clarify regarding timezones, is correct as this tomorrow's schedule? http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2007&mont h=6&day=6&hour=17&min=0&sec=0&p1=224&p2=179&p3=136&p4=352 By the way the following can be used to schedule the meeting and select a time (which results in a link like the above one) http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html -- Stephen Green Partner SystML, http://www.systml.co.uk Tel: +44 (0) 117 9541606 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37 .. and voice Quoting Victor Rudometov <Victor.Rudometov@Sun.COM>: > I'd like to remind once again, that SPB is GMT+4 for now. > So it will be 9pm, which is a bit too late, but I'll try to attend. > > Victor Rudometov wrote: >> Hi, Jacques. >> >> S-A works for me. >> >> Thanks. >> Victor. >> >> Durand, Jacques R. wrote: >>> OK, so looking at the current availability charts, let us try to >>> get some reaction from those silent on their availability: >>> It appears that *Wednesdays* might be better for both schedules. >>> *(S-A)* (would replace current 7am Thursday call) >>> *Wednesday*: 5pm GMT (8pm StPetersb, [2am Beijing, 3am Seoul], >>> 10am California, 1pm EastCoast, 5pm UK) (really bad for: Seoul, >>> Beijing) >>> *(S-B)* (new alternate call) >>> *Wednesday*: 4am GMT (7am StPetersb, 1pm Beijing, 2pm Seoul, 9pm >>> California, [midnight EastCoast, 4am UK,] ) (really bad for: >>> EastCoast, UK) Comments? >>> Note: an additional requirement is that both chairs can make both >>> scehdules, in case one needs replacement. >>> Jacques >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> ---- >>> *From:* Patrick.Curran@Sun.COM [mailto:Patrick.Curran@Sun.COM] >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 30, 2007 3:57 PM >>> *To:* Durand, Jacques R. >>> *Cc:* tag@lists.oasis-open.org >>> *Subject:* Re: [tag] Meeting schedules >>> >>> Well... As I explained in the Conference Call Availability >>> <http://wiki.oasis-open.org/tag/ConcallAvailability> page on the >>> Wiki, 7:00 am Pacific time on Thursdays probably will *not* work >>> for me in the future. >>> >>> However, since tomorrow is OK and since I'll be out for the next >>> few weeks, I don't suggest changing this now. >>> >>> As for the alternate week's schedule, it's difficult for me to >>> respond without a more specific suggestion. I've indicated my >>> availability - 9:00 pm Pacific time (5:00 am GMT) works for me >>> (except for Friday) but 6:00 pm (3:00 am) does not. >>> >>> In general, as I've already said, I'm amenable to an alternating schedule. >>> >>> I really don't think we're going to be able to work this out >>> unless *everyone* indicates their availability in writing. We have >>> a Wiki page where we can do this (see the reference above, but so >>> far only three of us have entered our data. I encourage the others >>> to do so. >>> >>> Durand, Jacques R. wrote: >>>> >>>> COnsidering the option where : >>>> >>>> - we use alternate 1h meeting schedules: >>>> week 1: schedule A >>>> week 2: schedule B >>>> week 3: schedule A >>>> etc. >>>> - and we accept the fact that not everyone will be able to make >>>> it at every meeting, but that everyone will like at least one >>>> schedule (A or B). >>>> We could consider: >>>> - schedule A is for accommodating everyone except Asia (could >>>> remain 2pmGMT as current Thu, >>>> or be 4pm or 5pm GMT.) >>>> - schedule B is good for Asia (office hours) and for >>>> accommodating everyone except UK and East coast (5amGMT) or >>>> everyone except UK and Russia (3amGMT) >>>> Would that be acceptable, knowing that all major decisions would >>>> be taken by electronic ballot? >>>> (conference calls would be used mostly to (a) make progress >>>> toward consensus on some tech topic, (b) bring up new issues and >>>> initiate some discussion, (c) discuss logistics and >>>> administrative aspects.) >>>> -Jacques >>>> >>> >>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]