[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [tag] Thread: TA Modeling -- (formerly: RE: [tag] TestAssertion Model suggestion, 'Take Four')
I agree -Steve Quoting "Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com>: > Stephen: > > General comment: > > That structure below seems more appropriate for the markup phase. > I find it rather scary/daunting in a general guideline doc, or too > detailed... > > Primary concern for me: a guideline doc that people feel they can use > after just one reading, and can apply easily to their own specification. > I'd reserve the details for those willing to go to the next step - a > formal processable representation (not everyone !) > > Cheers, > Jacques > > -----Original Message----- > From: stephen.green@systml.co.uk [mailto:stephen.green@systml.co.uk] > Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 2:12 PM > To: tag@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [tag] Test Assertion Model suggestion, 'Take Four' > > Proposed: > > 1..n Test Assertions Guideline > -1..1 Identifier: <ID> > -1..1 Version: <ID> > -0..1 Previous Version: <Link> > -1..1 Description: <Text> > -1..1 Date: <Date> > <more here - authors, etc?> > -0..n Specification > --0..1 Specification Cross Reference: <Link> > --0..1 Specification Description: <Text> > -0..n Specification Module > --0..1 Specification Module Cross Reference: <Link> > --0..1 Specification Module Description: <Text> > -0..n Specification Variation (Profile, etc) > --0..1 Specification Variation Cross Reference: <Link> > --0..1 Specification Variation Description: <Text> > -0..n Test Assertion Guideline Variation > --0..1 Test Assertion Guideline Variation Cross Reference: <Link> > --0..1 Test Assertion Guideline Variation Description: <Text> > -0..n Comment: <Text> > -0..n Pre-requisite > --0..1 Pre-requisite Cross Reference: <Link> > --0..1 Pre-requisite Description: <Text> > -0..n Test Assertion > --1..1 Test Assertion ID: <ID> > --0..n Specification requirement > ---0..1 Specification requirement Cross Reference: <Link> > ---0..1 Specification requirement quote: <Text> > --0..? Item under test: <Text> > --0..1 Assertion Description: <Text> > --0..n Normative Comment: <Text> > --0..1 Test Assertion Pass Criteria: <Text> > --0..n Test > ---0..1 Test ID: <ID> > ---0..n Pre-condition > ----0..1 Pre-condition Description: <Text> > ----0..1 Pre-condition Cross Reference: <Link> > ---0..n Test Trigger > ----0..1 Test Trigger Description: <Text> > ----0..1 Test Trigger Cross Reference: <Link> > ---1..n Test Effect > ----0..1 Test Effect Description: <Text> > ----0..1 Test Effect Cross Reference: <Link> > > Proposed amendments made: > added: head identifier and description > added: specification/variability references, etc (modules, profiles, > etc) > added: links to another set of test assertions which are varied in this > one > added: pre-requisites > removed: post-conditions > > -- > Stephen Green > > Partner > SystML, http://www.systml.co.uk > Tel: +44 (0) 117 9541606 > > http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37 .. and voice > > > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]