Re: [tag] Thread: TA modeling - RE: [tag] TA Model still weak on tests of structure?

["Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com>]

On 26/09/2007, stephen.green@systml.co.uk <stephen.green@systml.co.uk> wrote:
> An example of how I would see this working:

> -------------------------------------
>
> Test Assertion:
> BP1309
>
> Prerequisites:
> BP1701

This is part of the test flow, not the individual test.
If it is a true dependency, then the test flow control must
code this in. Right logic, wrong place.


>
> Trigger:
> [Not specified]

In which case not required, other than to say when the test runs?


>
> Test Expression:
> For a candidate envelope containing a soap:Body element the
> soap:Envelope does not have direct children after the soap:Body element
>
> Outcome:
> The Test Expression MUST be true

Badly designed? What expression?
What variables.
A test must test something, some test outcome must be measured
in some way.

regards




-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk