Re: [tag] updated agenda

[stephen.green@systml.co.uk]

Number for call-in ?


-- 
Stephen D. Green

Partner
SystML, http://www.systml.co.uk
Tel: +44 (0) 117 9541606

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37 .. and voice



Quoting "Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com>:

> Minor updates to agenda:
> - item #4 (added two new "guideline-related issues" i025, i026, see
> http://wiki.oasis-open.org/tag/DocIssues) and giving it a bit more time
> (+30mn) while assigning 1h to item #5.
> - item #7 will be continuation of whatever is left from #4 and #5.
>
> Also reminder to Kevin and Paul to be prepared to talk for item #6.
>
> Jacques
>
> Test Assertions Guidelines (TAG) TC F2F meeting, Mar 27-28, 2008
> ================================================================
> General objective:
> a complete draft of the test assertions guideline document,
> with at most a few non-critical unfinished points, and agreed-upon
> editorial work.
>
> ======================================================================
> Day 1: Thursday 27th, AM:
> ======================================================================
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 1. Kick-off (15mn):
> - Review of the agenda and proposed updates.
> - F2F logistics.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 2. Review of general structure and flow of the Guideline doc. (1h)
> - discuss options for general layout, treatment of Best Practices,
> glossary core vs. secondary, editorial aspects.
> - overall size of document and of each section.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 3. Section-by-section "general review" (1h30)
> - gathering comments on each sections (either candidate new issues,
> or recommendations for editor's next update).
>
> ======================================================================
> Day 1: Thursday 27th, PM:
> ======================================================================
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 4. Discussion on current Open Issues: (2:30h)
> - i019
> - i020 (subprime predicates)
> - i021
> - i022 (variables)
> - i023
> - i024 (case of refs to external specifications)
> - i025 (grouping / tags)
> - i026 (classification)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 5. K-TAG forum: proposals & analysis (1h)
> - treatment of Optional, normative statements: potential best practice /
> examples
> - the notion of "capability" TAs, for assessing the use of some feature.
>
> ======================================================================
> Day 2: Friday 28th, AM:
> ======================================================================
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 6.Technical points: (1h30)
> - "inheritance" aspects (Kevin)
> - "identifying versions" (Paul)
> - Pre-requisites details
> - others?
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 7. Follow-up on prior day unfinished business for Issues (# 4, # 5).
> (1h30)
> (either old or newly filed issues), plus if time allows:
> - Best practices
> - review of examples.
>
> ======================================================================
> Day 2: Friday 28th, PM:
> ======================================================================
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 8. Review of References: both inline refs, and prior art / further
> reading (2h)
> - candidate inline refs.
> - Editorial treatment and coverage of external related work that is
> worth
> commenting about.
> Either from other SDOs, or from industry-specific groups).
> o W3C QA framework
> o the Schematron model
> o ADL
> o IEEE http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=147962
> o others
> o the Voting standard group: "implementation statements".
> http://www.eac.gov/vvsg/part1/chapter02.php/
> o test-driven developt:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test-driven_development
> o PosTECH:
> http://iisl.postech.ac.kr/publication/thesis/2007-wjy-ppt.pdf.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 9. Discussion on how to approach the XML mark-up next step. (1h)
> - objectives to achieve
> (what tooling is expected to handle the mark-up: browser? test engine?)
> - the case for TA executability, in some specific domain
> (e.g. XPath predicates in schematron, in WS-I TAs)
>
>
>
>