0D4373E9E1236F42AB63FD6B5B306AA3A06548@SV-EXCHANGE.fjcs.net"
type="cite">
Yes - now of course that does
not mean the doc has to freeze until Dima gives the first round of
feedback / suggestions.
Stephen: one way to manage this
kind of "concurrent editing" , is via the wiki (as tagged comments as
usual)
We can then synchronize
frequently, say every 2-week, if editors are OK working on a moving
target.
So the process could be like:
- the formal spec rev (0.996) is
for now the official one that editors (Dima and Stephen) work from.
- any ongoing suggestions or
requests for edits from the TC, would go in the wiki -
both editors look at these comments, possibly discuss them on wiki. If
of editorial nature, editors can make the decision to factor these in
their currently revised draft, say 0.997. If of technical nature, they
get on the TC agenda for discussion.
- editor(s) circulate a proposed
revision for next meeting (2-week period) or earlier if they feel like
it. As soon as the new Editors' draft is out, it serve as basis for
next round of edits/review.
Would that work for everyone?
Jacques
Do we agree that this is the version on which we would like Dima
(technical writer) to start
working?
--
Stephen D. Green
Document Engineering Services Ltd
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37
.. and voice