Re: [tamie] A closer look at BPMN 2

["Stephen Green" <stephen.green@documentengineeringservices.com>]

I think we might have a problem with the concept in proposal '08-11-07' that
a message 'ends when it is received'. A message is still being used in the
event board after it is 'received' when the message is being monitored. Also
the message is 'received' in different ways in multiple Tasks/SubProcesses
when, for example, the message gets processed by a web server, then by
a back-office system and possibly when the message is forwarded in a
process like drop-ship or factoring (also of course many kind of internal
process have to pass messages on from task to task).

Secondly, it would be interesting to see if the '08-11-07' proposed event
monitor maps exactly to what we mean in TaMIE by an event monitor.

2009/1/6 Stephen Green <stephen.green@documentengineeringservices.com>:
> We'd better take note that the second is (intended to be) RF on RAND
> (the first seems to be RF?)
>
> 2009/1/6 Durand, Jacques R. <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com>:
>> Interesting event modeling and reusable notations in BPMN2
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?bmi/08-11-07.pdf
>>
>> - Event models and different event types (see section 6). See also events
>> taxonomy in Fig 48 (section  7.7)
>> - Event "monitors" (section 7)
>> - also useful notations for different kinds of split / merge.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Also in a complementary (competing?) submission:
>>
>>
>> http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?bmi/08-11-01.pdf
>>
>> - See 7.7.7, table 7-2 about different event types and notations. See also
>> 8.2.4. and 10.4
>> - concept of Message (8.2.9) and of Correlations of different kinds (8.2.3)
>>
>>
>>
>> Jacques
>
>
>
> --
> Stephen D. Green
>
> Document Engineering Services Ltd
>
>
>
> http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37 .. and voice
>



-- 
Stephen D. Green

Document Engineering Services Ltd



http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37 .. and voice