[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [tamie] Question on uc3 again...
OK, your requirement from a business process management application perspective makes sense; but from the business perspective of the parties in the collaboration I'd say it also would make sense that they can accept some kinds or detail changes or additions to the order (notified using the Order Response) which do not require a further document to be sent. Maybe the sending of a signal is enough. These might be either 1. non-contractual changes (such as contact telephone number) or 2. contractually agreed changes such as change of delivery time within agreed limits Most likely though they are notifications of BuyerAgreedSubstituteOrderItems where the buyer already agreed that if one kind of item couldn't be provided then another particular item would be OK. It would seem a bit weak for the technical engineers to have to say to the business parties that the MUST use a document to agree on a case by case basis to such changes. It would seem OK to gloss over this for the purpose of our use case though. In some cases it may well be that the software partly has to dictate the business process a little. Maybe in some cases it would also be the contract legal technicalities which would dictate that there be an acceptance response to the response (such as OrderChange). The latter I doubt though. Best regards Steve 2009/3/6 Moberg Dale <dmoberg@axway.com>: > Question follows uc3 ubl diagram > > > > > > > > > > Consider the flow back through “Add Detail” activity. An Order Response > message is sent. A Receive Response activity occurs leading to an update > order choice. > > > > Why do we have three choices at “update order”? I think there should just > be “Cancel Order” or “Change Order” > > > > The “Accept Order” activity produces no message, while the other two produce > the changed order message or the cancel order message. > > > > What is the Seller expected to do if the Buyer enters the Accept Order > state? (A time out will lead to a performance failure…) > > > > It would make more sense to me if we reached Order Accepted by going back to > the Seller and then Receiving his Order Response Simple (or by agreement, > response not required.) -- Stephen D. Green Document Engineering Services Ltd http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37 .. and voice
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]