[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [tax] Sub-committees
Andy, I think it's likely that there'll be overlap of some sort between all three sub-committees and I expect the sub-committes will need to further define themselves in terms of objectives, deliverables and responsibilities, once they're formed. However, as far as acting as liason is concerned, one possible way this could be organized is for the Liason and Marketing group to focus on identifying potential partnerships, establishing communication and bringing the appropriate business or technical specialists into any related discussions. Likewise, the business and technical groups may suggest to the liason group those partnerships and communications we may need to go after. The detailed work between any two organizations would be in the domain of the business and techincal groups. I suppose we need to decide whether this separation of responsibility is warranted. Further comment? John John Glaubitz Vertex, Inc. Phone: +1 484 595 5877 Andy Greener <andy@gid.co.uk> To: tax@lists.oasis-open.org cc: 02/24/2003 12:27 Subject: Re: [tax] Sub-committees PM >Here are the possible names and descriptions for our sub committees: <snip> > > Technical Analysis < >The charter of the Technical Analysis sub committee is to implement the >requirements established during business analysis of the Tax Administration >process using XML Schema, DTD and other technologies. The sub committee >will identify technologies, techniques and best practices needed to produce >practical solutions and satisfy specific needs of tax participants. > >> Liaison and Marketing < >The Liaison and Marketing sub committee will establish relationships with >customers, partners and subject matter experts to ensure that the Tax XML >committee produces practical standards that meet the requirements and >expectations of tax participants. The purpose of the committee is to >contribute and enhance the evolution of XML standards with the ability to >meet the Tax Administration requirements. I think there is some overlap here, since identifying technologies and techniques should be done in conjunction with existing standards groups or bodies, and that seems to me to be 'liaison' of a kind. Perhaps the 'technical liaison' should sit with the Technical Analysis SC, and the customer/partner/marketing stuff should remain in the Liaison and Marketing SC. Comments? Andy -- Andy Greener Mob: +44 7836 331933 GID Ltd, Reading, UK Tel: +44 118 956 1248 andy@gid.co.uk Fax: +44 118 958 9005
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC