[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [tax] Sub-committees
Andy (and others: thanks), I agree with you about the urgency of the OECD "standard". There is also the work that has been done by the EU with regards to the schema they produced on e-commerce. Your colleagues from Customs and excise are involved in that. I do not know if Arnd is "listening" otherwise you and I could make the contact. An other urgent subject is the UBL document which is open for review. I read it, there is Tax in it but I do not know if there are chances here? Is it possible that some of the other members take a look so that we might coordinate a comment? Harm Jan -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Andy Greener [mailto:andy@gid.co.uk] Verzonden: dinsdag 25 februari 2003 16:12 Aan: tax@lists.oasis-open.org Onderwerp: Re: [tax] Sub-committees I'm also happy to go along with Harm-Jan's suggestion. If you're listening Michael, and in case there's any doubt, I'd like to participate in the technical SC. >I agree with Harm's approach. If we start with the sub-committees we >know for sure that we need, we can always add as needed. To begin with, >we can have the technical sub-committee look at the OECD work I think this is a relatively urgent short-term goal - there is a Schema already in existence for STF (the OECD "standard" transfer format) as proposed by Arndt, and we should be examining this to see how it might fit with existing standards such as UBL and ebXML Core Components. > Glenda's >suggestion, and other technical items. We can have the business >sub-committee look at business processes and liaisons. As we get further >along and produce some deliverables per our charter, we will be in a >much better position to revisit the sub-committee makeup and decide. > >"H.J.M. van Burg" wrote: >> >> Andy, John, >> >> As we look at the present list of participants in de TC, I do not know if we >> have the luxury situation to have three subgroups yet. I think we could do >> with two for the moment where one has a more technical scope and the other >> one a more business approach. >> Liaison with other bodies can take place on ad hoc basis, but most tiems, I >> presume it will be technical. >> I am fine with the descriptions produced so far but I would suggest that we >> try to start of with two groups. In my mind that was also the opinion >> during the teleconference. >> Of course we could do it otherwise. >> Any suggestions? >> > > Harm-Jan -- Andy Greener Mob: +44 7836 331933 GID Ltd, Reading, UK Tel: +44 118 956 1248 andy@gid.co.uk Fax: +44 118 958 9005
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC