[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [tax] Sub-committees
Alex, The OECD document is on the TaxXML web site at http://oasis-open.org/committees/tax/files/williamsburg2002/Oecdtaxxml_AL.ppt John Alex Fiteni <alex.fiteni@orac To: "H.J.M. van Burg" <hjvanburg@burgcomm.nl> le.com> cc: 'Andy Greener' <andy@gid.co.uk>, tax@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [tax] Sub-committees 02/25/2003 02:11 PM Can we get a URL for the OECD document, please? Alex "H.J.M. van Burg" wrote: > Andy (and others: thanks), > > I agree with you about the urgency of the OECD "standard". There is also the > work that has been done by the EU with regards to the schema they produced > on e-commerce. Your colleagues from Customs and excise are involved in that. > I do not know if Arnd is "listening" otherwise you and I could make the > contact. > An other urgent subject is the UBL document which is open for review. I read > it, there is Tax in it but I do not know if there are chances here? > Is it possible that some of the other members take a look so that we might > coordinate a comment? > > Harm Jan > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Andy Greener [mailto:andy@gid.co.uk] > Verzonden: dinsdag 25 februari 2003 16:12 > Aan: tax@lists.oasis-open.org > Onderwerp: Re: [tax] Sub-committees > > I'm also happy to go along with Harm-Jan's suggestion. > > If you're listening Michael, and in case there's any doubt, I'd like > to participate in the technical SC. > > >I agree with Harm's approach. If we start with the sub-committees we > >know for sure that we need, we can always add as needed. To begin with, > >we can have the technical sub-committee look at the OECD work > > I think this is a relatively urgent short-term goal - there is a Schema > already in existence for STF (the OECD "standard" transfer format) as > proposed by Arndt, and we should be examining this to see how it might fit > with existing standards such as UBL and ebXML Core Components. > > > Glenda's > >suggestion, and other technical items. We can have the business > >sub-committee look at business processes and liaisons. As we get further > >along and produce some deliverables per our charter, we will be in a > >much better position to revisit the sub-committee makeup and decide. > > > >"H.J.M. van Burg" wrote: > >> > >> Andy, John, > >> > >> As we look at the present list of participants in de TC, I do not know if > we > >> have the luxury situation to have three subgroups yet. I think we could > do > >> with two for the moment where one has a more technical scope and the > other > >> one a more business approach. > >> Liaison with other bodies can take place on ad hoc basis, but most tiems, > I > >> presume it will be technical. > >> I am fine with the descriptions produced so far but I would suggest that > we > >> try to start of with two groups. In my mind that was also the opinion > >> during the teleconference. > >> Of course we could do it otherwise. > >> Any suggestions? > >> > > > Harm-Jan > > -- > > Andy Greener Mob: +44 7836 331933 > GID Ltd, Reading, UK Tel: +44 118 956 1248 > andy@gid.co.uk Fax: +44 118 958 9005 -- PK (See attached file: alex.fiteni.vcf)
Attachment:
=?iso-8859-1?Q?alex.fiteni.vcf?=
Description: Binary data
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC