Re: Fwd: RE: [tax] FW: [egov] A report comparing Australian CustomerInformation Standards with the OASIS CIQ Standards

[Alex Fiteni <alex.fiteni@oracle.com>]

Title:

Andy et al,

Generally I find some support internally for CIQ.  There is already an acid
test and that is the Audit file.   Perhaps we could work on mapping CIQ and
the audit file?

Alex

Andy Greener wrote:
> There's a danger that all three of us will forward this, but as I'm
> furthest east I guess I have the best chance of avoiding any contention...
>
> > From: "Ram Kumar" <rkumar@msi.com.au>
> > To: "Sandy Foote" <sandyfoote@footeworks.ca>,
> >   "'Andy Greener'" <andy@gid.co.uk>, <john.glaubitz@vertexinc.com>
> > Subject: RE: [tax] FW: [egov] A report comparing Australian Customer Information Standards with the OASIS CIQ Standards
> > Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 13:16:53 +1100
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > CIQ TC is in the liaison committee of UBL TC and for long
> > has been advocating the use of CIQ standards in UBL. At this
> > stage, UBL is interested only in addresses.
> >
> > I am a strong advocate of reuse of standards within OASIS TCs
> > before OASIS even preaches interoperability to the outside world.
> > As John said in his earlier mail, CIQ TC has been trying its best
> > to liaise with any group to reuse its standards. But in most of
> > the cases, political agenda is the winner against the reality!
> > Election and Voting Services TC, Human Markup TC, etc reuse CIQ standards.
> > I hope your TC comes up with a policy to reuse CIQ standards. The CIQ TC is
> > pretty open for any changes to the standards, suggestions, etc. We
> > constantly look for feedback.
> >
> > I do not have permission to post to your TC mailing list. Please
> > forward this message to your TC mailing list if this message makes sense.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ram Kumar
> > Chair, OASIS CIQ TC
> >